SarkOzy |
04-05-2010 07:41 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by theholycow
(Post 73751)
When it does finally kick, which I hope isn't until 600,000 miles, if I can I'll definitely autopsy it with photos.
>195,000 miles and still going. Yesterday I accidentally stuck it in R at 45mph, engine stalled so I restarted in N and kept going like nothing went wrong. :crazy: Anyway, I was afraid but it seems ok.
|
:rofltank:
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2005_Silverado
(Post 73765)
I did notice that in D, youd slow down faster, pero in N Id get like 50mpg, not 9999999999999mpg :pepper: In my case, the downhill section was pretty steep and short and with traffic, so no haz to try to get farther cuz I was tapping my brakes all the way down anyways. I have noticed some cars slow down less than others in D though. My mom's 01' Marquis WOULD NOT slow down going down a 6% grade like my 00 RCSB would. Id eventually get up to comperable speeds but it took me a lot longer...mebeh it was cuz her car was lower, heavier and with narrower tires? :hmm:
|
That's because in D the forward clutches are applied engaging the sprag, which give you engine braking. :read:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manbearpig
(Post 73778)
I have yet to mess with the DFCO tables with efi, guys over on the efilive forum say they can get some good mileage gains with their tables
I like my lean cruise though :D
|
Fuck yo lean cruise. :crazy:
I played with my decel-cutoff some but never saw that many gains. Went back to me stock PCM and see less than 1mpg difference so it could just be a rounding error. :roflmao:
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2005_Silverado
(Post 73807)
Im no QJ fan boy cuz theyre kinda ugly pero theyre good carbs :shrug: I liked my edelcawk cuz it was purty and me primo's holley double pumper pero again, wasnt any more reliable than QJ he replaced.
|
DNW qjest
|