|
08-08-2016, 07:56 PM | #2501 |
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hoenn
Posts: 85,082
|
dat W10 anniversary update
dark mode clocks on allthemonitors linux subsystem
__________________
|
11-01-2016, 05:22 PM | #2502 |
Bovinus Administratus
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greener pastures
Posts: 32,377
|
__________________
|
11-01-2016, 05:41 PM | #2503 |
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hoenn
Posts: 85,082
|
tbh I've never had to deal with licensing around here. How has it changed? (yes, too lazy to google previous licensing models)
__________________
|
11-01-2016, 08:35 PM | #2504 |
Bovinus Administratus
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greener pastures
Posts: 32,377
|
It used to be per instance of the OS. If you have 3 Windows VMs and 2 Windows physical machines then you need 5 licenses. (Actually, for a while they allowed 2 VMs per license, so you'd actually only need 4 licenses in that example and you still had license enough to install another VM).
Now they're doing it by CPU core count...except they don't explain very clearly whether they're concerned about physical CPU cores or virtual ones. I have my ESXi hosts oversubscribed with VMs assigned twice as many cores as actually exist. Further, VMs migrate inside of host clusters as needed, so one day there might be 12 VMs on host A and 2 on host B, another day there might be 8 and 6, etc. I know that we can't ask them to sell based on how much it costs them, but for fuck's sake, core count has no bearing on their costs or even their revenue except if I replace two servers with one more powerful one -- but what of higher clock speeds and other performance enhancements? Are they going to start charging for that shit? This is ridiculous.
__________________
|
11-02-2016, 06:45 AM | #2505 |
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hoenn
Posts: 85,082
|
One license per 2gb of RAM or 500gb of space, whichever is smaller.
Sent from my LG V10
__________________
|
11-02-2016, 11:58 AM | #2506 |
Bovinus Administratus
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greener pastures
Posts: 32,377
|
One license per iSCSI link.
One license per GHz of clock speed...
__________________
|
11-02-2016, 01:55 PM | #2507 |
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hoenn
Posts: 85,082
|
In addition to one license per client that may connect to said server. See section 5 for fees related to over usage.
Sent from my LG V10
__________________
|
11-02-2016, 04:02 PM | #2508 |
Bovinus Administratus
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greener pastures
Posts: 32,377
|
Per-client licensing is already a thing...Client Access Licenses are required for some roles and we have hundreds of them.
__________________
|
11-02-2016, 04:08 PM | #2509 |
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hoenn
Posts: 85,082
|
again, I don't deal with licensing
__________________
|
11-20-2016, 08:37 PM | #2510 |
melons :drool:
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Jawja
Age: 35
Posts: 11,442
|
What you guys think?
Need to replace my moms laptop, a HP Pavillion DV5-1010US from 2008. It will be $350 on Thursday, is this a worthy upgrade? http://www.bestbuy.com/site/dell-ins...?skuId=5579395
__________________
|
11-21-2016, 02:14 AM | #2511 |
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hoenn
Posts: 85,082
|
i5 or i7 and 8gb or more is usually my recommendation. The only thing its missing is an SSD but for $350 hell yeah.
I'm also a fan of DellRefurbished.com if you don't mind a used machine. Paid about $300 out the door for an i7, 8gb, 500gb, backlit keyboard, Bluetooth, etc and its a Latitude 6000 series so they're made pretty well. Sent from my LG V20
__________________
|
11-21-2016, 06:00 AM | #2513 |
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hoenn
Posts: 85,082
|
Yeah that's plenty of machine for most people.
Sent from my LG V20
__________________
|
12-23-2016, 12:15 AM | #2514 |
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hoenn
Posts: 85,082
|
__________________
|
12-23-2016, 12:17 AM | #2515 | |
C-E-Z★ bitch
|
Good thing i just bought ssd
__________________
Quote:
|
|
12-23-2016, 12:36 AM | #2516 |
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hoenn
Posts: 85,082
|
now tear that bish apart and reseat cables and look for broken stuffs
__________________
|
12-23-2016, 01:33 AM | #2517 | |
C-E-Z★ bitch
|
fts
__________________
Quote:
|
|
12-26-2016, 01:40 AM | #2518 |
♪♫Boogie Woogie King♫♪
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Jurrjah
Posts: 12,568
|
Got wifeh new laptop. I ain't having this McAfee shit. And win 10 won't let ya install security essentials. What's good av to use?
Sent from my SAMSUNG S7.
__________________
|
12-26-2016, 01:42 AM | #2519 | |
C-E-Z★ bitch
|
condoms
__________________
Quote:
|
|
12-26-2016, 02:12 AM | #2520 |
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Delawhere?
Age: 39
Posts: 4,538
|
Ms security essentials is built into win10 it's called Windows defender now.
Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk
__________________
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
12-26-2016, 02:13 AM | #2521 |
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hoenn
Posts: 85,082
|
Yep, Defender = Essentials.
And McAfee gtfo Sent from my LG V20
__________________
|
02-08-2017, 10:38 PM | #2522 |
♪♫Boogie Woogie King♫♪
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Jurrjah
Posts: 12,568
|
Ok, so I need help ASAP.
I forgot hwo to do this. I have 2 devices that will be talking to each other over the WAN. Its 2 repeater stations that ping each other everfy few seconds to see which one is closer to the mobile unit that is trying to use it. what my question is, I have a static IP address for each location with 2 useable IP's. How do I need to set this up so they can see each other? Would it be a Static route? Policy route? NAT entry? what?? I'm workign on this right as we speak and failing
__________________
|
02-08-2017, 10:55 PM | #2523 |
Bovinus Administratus
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greener pastures
Posts: 32,377
|
I'm having trouble understanding...how are they talking to each other over WAN? If they are talking directly to each other then they are LAN, not WAN.
Can you post the IPs? You could obfuscate them to protect the innocent.
__________________
|
02-08-2017, 11:18 PM | #2524 |
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hoenn
Posts: 85,082
|
if they're in the same subnet, they should just see each other with no fanciness, right? I guess it depends on the setup.
__________________
|
02-08-2017, 11:30 PM | #2525 |
Bovinus Administratus
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greener pastures
Posts: 32,377
|
Yup. No route needed, for example, if they are 172.16.2.8 and 172.16.2.201 with a netmask of 255.255.255.0. You could even remove the default gateway and they'd still talk to each other.
__________________
|
Bookmarks |
Tags |
big floppy donkey dick, chance is gay, i play mw2 on pc, information technology, it sekz, iz no it gai, nerds |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|
|